bird data > past walk reports

1/30/12

There is a cadence to a winter dream. It steeps within a drop of rain and, lost to touch, there is an opening eye or a zephyr's smile rising to a morning's kiss. A rib of day has turned and I see the pastel cadence in a winter's walk. The vignettes are in old motions and new hopes, casting in a blossom moment that opens in a song with no voice but holds to patterns of the day for a bird, perhaps, for many birds. The heat beneath me drifts away until I can not feel the losing but I hear in the shower, drops cascading to the passing of time. The bed has become cool. A raven greets the day and I know it's time to get up. It's Monday morning.

This week, the walk felt like what a reasonable Caltech winter bird walk is supposed to feel like. The trees, with one prominent exception, weren't dripping with birds and the fields were devoid of them. Hawks were absent, except for a single red-shouldered hawk, kee-aahing repeatedly in the distance and we've been having a very tough extended time with seeing sparrows of almost any description. So, what's to like? It was a walk in contrast. In two of the last three walks, we ended with below median species counts and this was no accident. The density of birds of any description was low. In one of those walks, we didn't even net a crow until nearly half way through. Last week was better in that we were above median and above 20 (21) but the species total was built off the perils of Pauline and a lucky draw from the second half of the walk. This week, we picked up species at a fairly steady clip and the density of individuals was much higher than it had been over the last three weeks, although it was still a bit sporadic. We had multiple examples of most of the species we picked up and this holds the promise for next week. It felt like what a 20+ species walk was supposed to feel like and we ended up at 22, three above the median of 19.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

There were two highlights. The first of these, chronologically second, was in an oak by the Tournament Park restrooms. Vicky noticed a bird foraging actively but almost always to the upper side of the leaves so that we were getting only glimpses of bits of bird. Ashish and I joined the chase but none of us could net a clear look. It was tantalizing and frustrating. The bird was silent but dropping hints like bread crumbs. The bottom was grayish white but there was no throat patch. There was stippling along the side and the wing had at least one arcuate white band and the legs were dark. The face was a "wild" interplay of white and black with a warbler's beak. So, we were eventually, from the flotsam debris, able to construct a female black-throated gray warbler. Perhaps, you have been seeing lots of black-throated grays where you live but this is big news for us. We haven't seen a black-throated gray warbler since October and it was not an unreasonable fear that we might not see another before the Spring migration, if then. There was, however, a cost to taking so much time to build an unimpeachable bird, as Vicky and I completely lost contact with the rest of the group. I eventually caught up but Vicky had to leave the walk before she could relay her triumph to Alan. I would mark the affair as definitely worth the price but, if Vicky's bird had turned into a chickadee or a kinglet, I might have been giving you a paragraph's worth of sour grapes.

The second highlight of the walk beat in the heart of Tournament Park. Near the sapsucker tree, we saw several species of birds clustered near one spot, probably the most species-rich view of the month. It was so rich that we were all having trouble keying into what the next person was seeing. You would inevitably see something else in the indicated direction and it clearly wasn't the species your companion was describing. We pulled a nice orange-crowned warbler from the foliage and a mountain chickadee. The highlight, however, was the magnificent viewing of a male Nuttall's woodpecker. You could see the crisp whitish ladder rungs walking up this bird's otherwise black back and the broad black shoulder. The bird also showed excellent side views and head shots. Ashish got a pretty good picture of the bird, amazingly good, given the lighting. He was kind enough to post the photo, so anybody who wants to can relive the moment or fulfill a need for a little woodpecker envy.

We seem to be in a time of change. Sightings of some birds like rock pigeons have dropped dramatically in the last few years. For others, like the red-whiskered bulbul, the opposite has occurred. Nuttall's woodpeckers are in the latter class. Between 2000 and 2009, we averaged three Nuttall's sightings a year, clearly a bird you were never shocked to see but certainly not one that you went on a walk expecting to find. In 2010, we had eight sightings, twice the previous high of four. Last year, we had 15 sightings, nearly doubling the previous best again. So, in case you are wondering about this year, pair bonding is starting up about now, nest excavation (an all male production) will start around late March or the beginning of April and egg laying, probably around mid-April, though it could be a little earlier. The nest may be active into June, and the fledglings will be fed through July. Nuttall's like oaks but will take on other types of trees, especially sycamores, where oaks are scarce (I've had a pair nesting in a sycamore in my back yard for the last couple of years). In late July or early August, the parents kick the juveniles out of their territory. Nuttall's sightings at Caltech are rare in September and this may be related to a tendency for adult Nuttall's to move up and east following the breeding season.

It's hard to overstate the importance of a primary hole nester like a male Nuttall's woodpecker on the local avian ecology. The Nuttall's will excavate a nesting hole as you may expect but he also makes a suite of roosting holes and some bolt holes for escape from predators like Cooper's hawks. There are many secondary hole nesters like tree swallows, western bluebirds, and starlings that depend to a large degree on old woodpecker holes, so much so that they will sometimes try to muscle their way into an active woodpecker hole. So, a male Nuttall's carves out multiple holes in his territory to cover use and loss. That's a lot of work and requires a lot of protection because of the intense competition from secondary hole nesters and, in some places, larger woodpeckers. This may be part of why a woodpecker is, in general, so attentive to the young. If you aren't, somebody may take over your nest or even kill your chicks as part of trying to take over your nest. So, what's in it for the woodpecker? Plenty. The Nuttall's carves a tunnel leading to a chamber nest, which defeats any large snatch and fly predator like a raven, who would, I am sure, develop a fondness for woodpecker eggs if he could just get at them. Since he can't get his head in through the tunnel and being a very smart bird, he doesn't even bother to try. Instead, he flies over to a more open starling nest, sticks in his head and pulls out a chick or he carefully surveys a pine, branch by branch, locates a band-tailed pigeon nest (he knew it was in there somewhere), and swipes an egg. It is perhaps no surprise that the Nuttall's has a much higher nesting success rate than your average open nesting bird. One consequence of greater predator safety and constant vigilance is that woodpeckers can take much longer to raise their young. A small nonpredatory open nesting bird, like a warbler or a hummingbird, moves fast on the reproduction front, in part to minimize the probability of a nesting failure. You go from laying an egg to fledging in about three and half weeks. With secondary hole nesters, like western bluebirds or mountain chickadees, it's a little longer, perhaps four weeks. With primary hole nesters, it's five or six weeks. Averages for the Nuttall's are 14 days of incubation, and 26-29 days to fledge and, after that, Nuttall's woodpecker parents will feed the fledged juveniles for another month, much longer than typical of open nesting birds.

If a Nuttall's nest is close to our walk route, the parents will be by for a feeding several times an hour and that makes for good sighting chances over an extended period of time. Last year, we had a pair of Nuttall's nesting next to the driveway coming into the Tournament Park parking lot, which probably had a lot to do with the unusually high frequency of sightings last year. Unfortunately, we didn't notice the nesting hole until very late in the season or we might have done even better. The presence of an attractive adult male in Tournament Park on the cusp of the breeding season suggests that he has established a local territory and that this may be another banner year for Nuttall's woodpeckers.

The date: 1/30/12
The week number: 5
The walk number: 1128
The weather: 69°F, partly cloudy

The walkers: Alan Cummings, John Beckett, Ashish Mahabal, Vicky Brennan, Tom Palfrey, Hannah Dvorak-Carbone, Kent Potter, Viveca Sapin-Areeda, Carole Worra

The birds (22):

Northern Mockingbird
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
American Crow
Mallard
Bushtit
Yellow-rumped Warbler
Lesser Goldfinch
Red-shouldered Hawk
Ruby-crowned Kinglet
Nuttall's Woodpecker
Red-whiskered Bulbul
Orange-crowned Warbler
Mountain Chickadee
Band-tailed Pigeon
Black Phoebe
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Gull, species
Black-throated Gray Warbler
Snowy Egret

-- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
2/3/12

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html






1/24/12

Leavening humility is something I can recommend to others but, for the last two weeks, we have been consuming our own pie of submedian species counts. I can't say that I much like the taste, so I am happy to announce that we managed to break the bitter trend with a better than mediocre performance, even though it was looking to be another difficult walk. The birds were sparsely distributed, although Viveca, Vicky, and I got a fairly good back view of a juvenile red-tail; Alan and Kent worked a warbler very hard and eventually concluded that it was an orange-crowned. I got a very good view (head, breast, back, and wings) of an American goldfinch (poetic justice, given that everybody else in the group was extolling the beauty of his song, which I couldn't hear, although I could see him singing; he took off before anybody else could get a glass on him). Several of us also got an excellent view of the ruby crown on a ruby-crowned kinglet. Usually, the crown on these birds is hidden unless they are excited or disturbed. Apparently, having fifty bushtits fluttering all around you is exciting. We also saw a lot of acorn woodpeckers in various places along the route. So much for the early highlights. Half way through the walk we were only up to 14 species, about where we had been the previous two weeks. However, the back half of the walk was unusually productive with both "common" birds, like a mourning dove and a northern mockingbird, and much rarer treats like a mountain chickadee and a snowy egret. The chickadee provided a stellar view, probably our best over the last year, which is saying a lot. The egret was much less giving. The snowy had been sighted on Baxter pond on Sunday and Monday but we failed to see him during the walk. Tom, however, saw it hanging out on the roof of Baxter as he returned to his office and e-mailed the bird in. We were at 21, two above the average of 19. Never you mind what the record is.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

Now, the bird of the week is not so much a highlight bird as a curiosity and it's motivated by a simple question: where have all the pigeons gone? We saw a pigeon on Millikan at the beginning of the walk and, later, we saw a pair flying near the north end of campus. A decade ago, I would see dozens of rock pigeons hanging around and nesting on Bridge above the driveway leading up to Arms (they used to be called rock doves but if you live by the AOU code, you have to call them pigeons now). Now, there are none. Caltech sealed them off. You wouldn't think that this would be defining, as many cities have tried to reduce pigeon populations through removal of nesting sites with no success. Until very recently, rock pigeons were not merely a common sighting on the bird walk. They were virtually obligatory. In 2007, we had 47 weeks with a rock pigeon sighting. This dropped to 42, the following year, 26 in 2009, 12 in 2010, and 21 in 2011, much of which reflected a small flock of four birds that frequented Wilson near San Pasqual so we may be in for another slow pigeon year. The dramatic drop in Caltech population and sightings does not appear to be associated with changes in the local hawk population as sightings of hawks and, particularly, of Cooper's hawks, who are always ready for a good meal of pigeon, show no anti-correlation with sightings of rock pigeons. The maintenance crew decided to block off the cavities on Bridge and this caused some loss of nesting "habitat" but I find it hard to believe that this would have had a long-term impact. Pigeons are flexible with nest sites when they have to be. On the other hand, perhaps the loss of nests that had been in use for a decade fledging dozens of pigeons, was psychologically traumatic, and made the flock decide to move to a more accommodating environment. Perhaps, our loss is the Freeway's gain. I don't know. It's a puzzle.

Pigeons are generally viewed as nuisance birds in urban areas and they have a strong association with urban or agricultural interests. So, in a general sense, we have done it to ourselves. Wild doves, including wild (as opposed to feral) rock pigeons, are generally territorial, especially near nesting sites but, if you are raising pigeons, you want them to tolerate close proximity so that you can maximize the number of birds in your coop. So, what do you do? You breed out territoriality. That male acting aggressively in your coop looks like supper. The genes pick up on this really fast and you soon end up with birds that can tolerate extremely close quarters. You breed against territoriality and, in the blink of a genetic eye, you have feral birds that are limited only by food availability and we toss out plenty, often on purpose. They may be native to Europe, the Middle East, northern Africa, and parts of Asia, but they are now the world's bird of urbanity.

You might think that rock pigeons are rather promiscuous, as you will often see courting behavior in a flock. Rock pigeons are, however, socially monogamous and really mean it. Pair bonds are very strong and there is little evidence for significant extra-pair fertilization. All that courting happens because rock pigeons can breed at six months and can breed every six weeks, one of the reasons it is so hard to extirpate them in a particular area. The ancients had it right. Ishtar, the Assyrian goddess of Heaven and Earth, is often depicted holding a couple of pigeons. They were sacred to Astarte, the Middle East's goddess of love and fertility. The Greeks and Romans associated them with Aphrodite and Venus. They are about love, devotion, and fertility. Rock pigeons were an early domestication success for urban humans, starting about 5,000 years ago in what is now Iraq and we brought them over to this country very early in the seventeenth century. They haven't managed to do much with the tundra yet but they have conquered the rest of North America, although the populations are closely associated with human activity and they are probably one of the few species that actually would miss us if humanity ever disappeared. Of course, it's a bit of a two-way street. Pigeons used to be major sources of protein for humans in environments that were and are protein challenged. They are the lab rats of the avian world. On whom else would we perform laparoscopically assisted hysterectomies (all survived the surgery; most did not survive the surgeon), or bone marrow transplants, or test drugs? A lot of people spend a lot of time thinking of ways to mess with rock pigeon minds and bodies.

I would be remiss if I didn't say something about homing in rock pigeons. Sometime in the first few weeks of life, a rock pigeon sets a home roost as the center of the universe and all subsequent travels are metered against this position. They don't migrate but they nevertheless have a variety of tools they can use to locate themselves relative to the desired home roost. They have a mental map of physical locations complete with olfactory and wind-aided cues. They know paths of previous flights to home, have a well-developed sun compass that is time sensitive (e.g., they can account for changes in declination of the sun through the day), and a magnetic compass, apparently built from nanoparticles of magnetite a few nanometers across in the upper beak and bundled up into clusters a micron or two in diameter. If you cart a rock pigeon twenty miles away, and release him, he will initially fly off in a semi-arbitrary direction but then figure out where he is relative to the center of the universe and adjust direction to match. Although this phenomenon was first discovered in rock pigeons, it appears to be feature of many bird species. You might say that they all follow their noses.

The date: 1/24/12
The week number: 4
The walk number: 1127
The weather: 65°F, partly cloudy

The walkers: Alan Cummings, Kent Potter, Vicky Brennan, John Beckett, Tom Palfrey, Viveca Sapin-Areeda, Carole Worra, Melanie Channon

The birds (21):

Rock Dove
Northern Mockingbird
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
American Crow
Yellow-rumped Warbler
Mallard
Orange-crowned Warbler
Black Phoebe
Red-tailed Hawk
American Goldfinch
Ruby-crowned Kinglet
Bushtit
California Towhee
Lesser Goldfinch
Common Raven
Nuttall's Woodpecker
Mountain Chickadee
Snowy Egret

-- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
1/27/12
http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html






1/17/12

Each time we go on the Caltech birding walk, we stop at the track south of the gym before moving on to Tournament Park. We look for sparrows in the grass and phoebes on the goals and, although this is not generally a hot spot, the odd meadowlark keeps us coming back. Of humans, we see mostly sloggers (slow joggers) but, occasionally, there is a strong runner and I begin to see the joy of the wind in an economy of motion and fluid articulation. It is then that I begin to appreciate why someone would run around a track multiple times. It's no longer mind numbing. You are in a zone. With the bird walk, we circle around the campus. We go the same way every week. Round and round the same circuit. There aren't any endorphins to be had. We don't run the lap but it's new every time. This week, the walk was pleasant but the birds were scarce. We didn't see anything that was especially rare but the spotted towhee in Tournament Park was a nice capture. This bird flushed next to the fencing by the track and stopped to express his annoyance while in full view. There was also a family of western bluebirds between Braun and Beckman, a new life bird for Melanie. These were our first January bluebirds since 2007. In the end, however, we found ourselves with just 17 species. This rather anemic total is three below 20, the median for week 3, which is three below the record of 23, and we were three above the record low of 14. We were in thrall of threes.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

In honor of Melanie's new lifer, I thought it appropriate to designate the western bluebirds as the species of the day. The fact that we saw a family group is promising because these birds usually establish wintering territories that cover three acres or so. Since we are in the middle of the winter and we had an adult male and female along with what I think was a juvenile male (male juveniles often overwinter with their parents; females disperse not long after fledging but will often find some unrelated adults to overwinter with and they will generally breed with a first year male from the same wintering group), there's a good chance that this group is wintering in our midst and looking for berries. We could have a shot at them until March, when they are likely to move up to higher elevations.

Like many songbirds, habitat loss is the biggest problem for western bluebirds as a species. They need insects during the breeding season, berries in the Fall, and most importantly, a viable nest. Western bluebirds are secondary hole nesters (they are partial to abandoned acorn woodpecker holes). Probably the key to survival of western bluebirds and most of their problems stem from a lack of nest cavities due to logging, leading to a lack of snags (standing dead trees) and dead limbs, urbanization (leading to a loss of snags and dead limbs as people get rid of the unsightly snags and dead limbs, thereby destroying avian habitat), agriculture, leading to a loss of snags and dead limbs. They do, however, do very well with nest boxes. It's not quite that simple because western bluebirds need relatively open areas for foraging but nesting is probably the weakest link for this species. There is habitat loss because of destruction of dead trees and limbs and there is competition from other hole nesters like starlings. On an individual level, western bluebirds can hold their own against starlings or just about anybody else for that matter. They are the bullies of my birdbath. Starlings are, however, relentless and, when sufficiently numerous, they can sometimes even drive acorn woodpeckers out of their primary nests, a short sighted victory to be sure as those are the guys excavating the new cavities. The search for suitable nesting sites by western bluebirds and dispersal of female juveniles after fledging probably accounts for the summer sighting that we occasionally get.

Western bluebirds are examples of cooperative breeders, as an unrelated year old bird (almost always a male) occasionally (~7% of the time) helps to feed the nestlings. This is a good deal for the breeding pair because more eggs will be laid, more chicks fed, and more nestlings fledged if there is a helper. What's in it for the helper is less clear as a helper doesn't gain any later breeding advantages and waiting a year to breed significantly reduces his lifetime fecundity but maybe it's as simple as not finding a mate. Western bluebirds are socially monogamous and mate for life but about half of the breeding females will have an extra-pair egg in her clutch. This is generally due to a carefully choreographed encounter with an older male, who provides nothing except the liaison.

The date: 1/17/12
The week number: 3
The walk number: 1126
The weather: 57°F, sunny

The walkers: John Beckett, Melanie Channon, Viveca Sapin-Areeda, Carole Worra, Vicky Brennan

The birds (17):

Mallard
Yellow-rumped Warbler
Anna's Hummingbird
Lesser Goldfinch
Black Phoebe
American Goldfinch
Band-tailed Pigeon
Spotted Towhee
House Finch
Ruby-crowned Kinglet
Bushtit
Yellow-chevroned Parakeet
Orange-crowned Warbler
American Crow
House Sparrow
Western Bluebird
Common Raven

-- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
1/23/12

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html






1/9/12 (revised to add a Raven)

It started as a lowing call, a nervous tally, a shattering of the unspoken dreams of a 30 bird day and it left a handful of clotted feathers from a clouded memory and a residue of tremulous anxiety. Alan knew the record high for week 2. It was 32 species, one of the biggest Caltech bird walks of all time. What he didn't know was what the record worst score for week 2 might be and this was an uncertainty that gnawed. It had seemed so promising, a nice day, perhaps unseasonably warm, but nice. Others must have thought so too for we had nine enthusiastic walkers. Surely, we were heading for record territory. Maybe we were, but it was soon clear that we weren't flirting with a record high. Record lows during the first quarter of the year bounce around semi-randomly between 10 and 15 and here we were, at 12 species, rumbling up Wilson. Maybe, we were safely above the low. Maybe, we weren't and, if we weren't, we might be in trouble. Generally, the number of new species we pick up on the second half of the walk is a small fraction of what we obtain from the first half. Partly, this reflects repeating species we've already seen (i.e., the second half of the walk would be much more productive for "new" species if we did it first) and partly this reflects the basic fact that the best birding on campus is to be found in the first half of the walk. So, we approach our standard house sparrow hunting grounds, the sheffleras outside the entrance to Braun and I meet the biggest surprise of my tenure of two years on the bird walk. The sheffleras didn't yield any sparrows but Matt saw a sparrow-like bird zip into the small row of Indian hawthorns in the middle of the walkway leading up to Braun. Perhaps, this was a house sparrow. Perhaps, it was something a little more exotic. Whatever it was, we had it surrounded with half a dozen birders covering every possible exit. We watch and we pish. Nothing works. Twigs and leaves are rustling but we can't coax a bird to the surface. The cover is too dense to make out the speciation of any bird in the interior and nobody is talking. Suddenly, Alan bats a bush. This was an utterly desperate act. Most birders, including Alan, frown on overt attempts to flush a bird because this forces the bird to consume energy and any flushing bird is potentially at an enhanced risk for predation once exposed. Alan nevertheless sweeps his hand across the bushes again and two house sparrows burst out, flying over to the foundation plants lining Braun. Alan bats the bushes a third time and three house sparrows flush. We had another species. We pick up some American goldfinches in nearby trees. We were at 14 but were we safe from infamy? Viveca sees a soaring turkey vulture, a nice capture, as we continue north on Wilson, which brought us, most likely into fairly safe territory. By the end of the walk, we had a total of 17 species. The median is 19 and we failed to get there, but we did end up some distance above 11, which turns out to be the previous and still record low for week 2.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

I think, since we had such a difficult walk from an avian perspective, that I will choose one of the least of our captures as the bird of the week. In the Maintenance yard, there was a single clear call from a bulbul followed, almost immediately, by a single clear "bulbul!" call from Hannah. That's it, the end of the story. There was no wonderful view to describe, no song, no careful working of a tree, trying to get a definitive look, no mystery. Nevertheless, this vignette provides me with everything I need. The red-whiskered bulbul is the bird I feel like talking about and we had one.

If you look at Alan's database and plot the number of bulbul sightings by year, you will find a striking pattern. For the first twenty years of the Caltech birding walk, sightings were quite rare, averaging one bird every four years. In 2006, we had one sighting, the first since 2004. In 2007, we had two sightings, the first time ever for back-to-back bulbul years. In 2008, it was 6, in 2009, it was 16, in 2010, we had 23, and in 2011, it was 24. Red-whiskered bulbuls had gone from next to nothing to one of our dozen most common birds in just four years. Since most of our bulbul "sightings" are, as was the case this week, identifications via the unmistakable vocalization, this means that we are capturing the invasion of an area near campus that is within our hearing range for these birds, perhaps a buffer zone encompassing two or three yards deep beyond the campus perimeter. There is little question that bulbuls are expanding out of a core area centered in the Huntington gardens and we have just witnessed the wave passing by the southern end of campus.

The first bulbul sightings at the Huntington were in 1968, so why has it taken so long for bulbuls to make the 1-2 km journey? Bulbuls are invasive when the local habitat is viable but bulbuls are also fairly indolent invaders. They were released in Melbourne, Australia in the 1880s and expanded their range by just 100 km over the ensuing century. The Huntington bulbuls had an additional problem that their Aussie cousins didn't have to contend with. In 1968, there were five bulbuls sighted on the grounds of the Huntington gardens. In 1968, there were five bulbuls shot on the grounds of the Huntington gardens. Several to a couple dozen bulbuls per year were killed through the 1970s in and near the Huntington by field agents of the Los Angeles County Department of Agriculture, using shotguns, pellet guns and slingshots. Bulbuls were and are listed as destructive agricultural pests by the state and the local Agriculture department took this to mean that it was desirable to kill feral bulbuls whenever and wherever they popped up. Finally, in 1985, the then director of the Huntington Library refused to grant access to the agricultural agents and, in the ensuing standoff, the county decided that it would reserve the right to crash through the front gate with guns blazing but, in the interim, would undertake a study to determine just how much the bulbuls threatened LA county crops. As near as I can determine, the study was never completed or, perhaps, even started and the eradication program has not been reinstituted. As much as I like those fruity voices, I can't say that I think the county agents were wrong to attack this introduced species. Bulbuls compete with native migratory frugivores like hermit thrushes and cedar waxwings for berries (also western bluebirds to some extent) and this likely adds to already substantial stresses for these native bird species. On the other hand, if I was worried about avian induced crop damage, I would have put my efforts into containing the starling population before putting much effort into killing bulbuls but governmental organizations work in mysterious ways.

If you do a histogram by week of bulbul sightings over the last five years from Alan's database, you will find a broad peak between weeks ~8 and ~24, centered around week 16 and another, much sharper, peak with a maximum around week 40. Remember that our sightings are mostly vocalizations and that bulbuls most strenuously vocalize when they are courting and defending territory. So, it seems likely that our bulbuls have a major breeding season between late February/early March and mid-June with another, shorter, session in mid-August through September, presumably to take advantage of the Fall berry crop. A similar pattern is observed in southern India, where red-whiskered bulbuls are native (they are native throughout southern Asia). The main breeding season is December to June with a second breeding period in September, following the monsoons. We have a lot of pools and fake streams, which bulbuls like, lined with berry-bearing bushes, which bulbuls like. We have a modest predator population, which bulbuls like, and a moderate supply of insects, which bulbuls like when the berries are in short supply. Judging from the data, our bulbuls are here to stay and breeding happily two or three times a year. Enjoy the concert.

The date: 1/9/12
The week number: 2
The walk number: 1125
The weather: 72°F, sunny

The walkers: Alan Cummings, John Beckett, Viveca Sapin-Areeda, Hannah Dvorak-Carbone, Carole Worra, Ashish Mahabal, Kent Potter, Matt Bradford, Vicky Brennan

The birds (18):

House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
American Crow
Mallard
Yellow-rumped Warbler
Red-whiskered Bulbul
Lesser Goldfinch
Ruby-crowned Kinglet
Bushtits
Downy Woodpecker
Black Phoebe
Turkey Vulture
American Goldfinch
Cedar Waxwing
Common Raven

-- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
1/13/12

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html






1/3/12

There are times when you know that a new record for the week is in the offing. Just capture another species or two and you are there. You look. You listen and the birds, however reluctant, are sought with a desperate vigor. It becomes a bit of a game. Sometimes, you can even transform a bird into an entirely different species. I once managed to turn a crow into a pigeon. Fortunately, this type of magic only works on yourself and does not will the acquiescence of other walkers. If you are to make that record, you will have to find that new real bird. On other occasions, you don't know what the record is and you take the birds as they come, not realizing that you have landed just shy or just ahead of the record. This week was in the latter category. We knew that the record was above 20 but it could have been, for all we knew, 21 or 29. So, we ended the walk with 22 species, but Viveca e-mailed in an orange-crowned warbler seen just after separating from us near the end of the walk. This left us at 23. The record for week 1 WAS 22. We have a new record at 23 and an excellent start to the new year.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

There were a number of highlights. We picked up a female western tanager near the parking lot for Tournament Park. Also, Hannah and Viveca both got flash-by views of a vireo near Morrisroe, picking up wingbars (hence not a warbling vireo) and a general sense of gray (probably not a Hutton's vireo, for which one would have expected a flash view to yield a sense of buff or brown, although of course you would then have the kinglet versus vireo issue to deal with). This is likely the Cassin's we have been seeing in this location for the last couple of weeks but neither Hannah nor Viveca could commit to a Cassin's. They didn't see any yellow wash along the side, raising the exciting possibility of a plumbeous vireo, which would have been a seriously rare sighting for Caltech, but they were also unsure, given the limited exposure time, that there was no yellow to be had. We had a vireo species.

The baseball field is usually the source of a bird or two but several times a year, it yields something really unusual like a meadow lark or even something spectacular, like an American pipet or a whimbrel. This week, several birds congregated near the southwest corner but it wasn't possible, without a spotting scope, which we didn't have, for us to determine the species with any degree of confidence. Speculation was running between house finch and western bluebird but this was based on not much beyond a tinge of blue or red. When this happens, Alan asks for a volunteer or two to mount an expedition to get a closer look while the rest of the group moves on to the track and Tournament Park. Sometimes, somebody just heads off before he can suggest it (he has us well trained). Hannah headed for the corner while Viveca worked her new 10X Nikon binoculars from the fence. The rest of us moved on. When they caught up with us, they reported not one but four new species, western bluebird, Say's phoebe, house finch, and white-crowned sparrow. Each in its own way is deserving of being the bird of the week ,but I will take the Say's and hope to see the others again over the next few weeks.

The Say's phoebe is one of those birds that has received much less study than it deserves. They are aridity specialists, the only flycatcher and one of only a dozen species to inhabit the below sea level portions of Death Valley on a resident basis. We pick them up as wintering birds with an arrival at Caltech around week 40-43 (early- to mid-October), about the same time we start to see kinglets and yellow-rumped warblers. However, they leave Caltech by week 10 (mid-March), well before most wintering birds, including other insectivores like the yellow-rump warblers. Our Say's phoebes are probably coming from the desert interior to the east and south although there may be some contribution from the Pacific northwest (there's at least one record of a bird from Washington turning up in Santa Barbara). Our sightings tend to be sporadic from year to year but an individual can be quite reliable as they tend to like certain perches and, perhaps more importantly for us, they tend to keep a schedule. A couple of years ago, a Say's decided that he really liked the soccer goal and we picked him up every week for several weeks. Unfortunately, the goal was taken down and we never saw him again, even though there were other perfectly goodlooking perching spots in the same vicinity. I guess that none of them was just right.

Death comes to each of us in its own time but with small birds it usually comes within a small number of years from one of many different causes, most of them rather unpleasant. If you don't starve to death in the nest, get killed by parasites, tossed out of the nest by a cowbird, or pulled out by a raven, then you get to fend for yourself. This often means starving to death in your first year. Even if you get plenty to eat, you may still be killed by a hawk (if you're having a good year, they are probably having a good year, too), by some virus, or by human intervention. We supply killer pesticides and herbicides, killer domestic cats, killer windows, killer wind vanes, killer TV and radio towers, killer power lines, and killer cars. This week, Melanie informed me that the resident black phoebe, who forages in front of Arms, was dead. This was a young bird, based on the easy perches he tended to use, but he had already supplied the Caltech bird walk list with a black phoebe on one or two occasions. I liked him and enjoyed watching him forage. I don't know what killed him but I can tell you that he seemed to be a successful flycatcher. My suspicion is that Caltech groundskeepers have been poisoning the insects he fed on because of the new plantings and these, in turn, poisoned and, ultimately, killed our black phoebe. God may have seen our phoebe falling from a tree but Caltech may have made it happen.

The date: 1/3/12
The week number: 1
The walk number: 1124
The weather: 82°F, partly cloudy

The walkers: Alan Cummings, Viveca Sapin-Areeda, Carole Worra, Hannah Dvorak-Carbone, Kent Potter, John Beckett, Vicky Brennan

The birds (23):

Scrub Jay
Northern Mockingbird
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
American Crow
Black Phoebe
Yellow-rumped Warbler
Snowy Egret
Lesser Goldfinch
Dark-eyed Junco
Ruby-crowned Kinglet
Western Bluebird
White-crowned Sparrow
Say's Phoebe
American Robin
Western Tanager
Red-tailed Hawk
Vireo Species
American Goldfinch
Downy Woodpecker
Common Raven
Orange-crowned warbler

-- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
1/8/12

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html






current walk report / two time plots / probability plots / raw data