bird data > past walk reports

8/27/12

The bones of the walk were about as good as you could reasonably expect for a warm August day. We came up with 19 species, just shy of our first 20 bird week since mid-June (week 25) and a little bit less shy of the record 21 for week 35, which was set back in 2002. Still we were well above the median of 13 and we had two excellent highlight birds.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

I decided to check on what it was that made the 2002 week 35 walk so strong and how that group managed to pick up two extra birds versus our walk. I had expected that the difference would turn on our missing a couple of common birds (for example, we didn't get a raven, which we might have reasonably hoped for, and I know that scrub jays were still common on campus in 2002). However, if you look at the two bird lists, the overlap is rather weak with only ten species common to both. We had a Nuttall's woodpecker. They had a downy. We got a turkey vulture. They got the raven. They got a mockingbird and a starling. Pooh! We saw lots of lesser goldfinches. They saw a western bluebird. We had a mountain chickadee. They got an orange crowned warbler and a hermit warbler (!), a seriously rare bird for Caltech but so distinctive, I can't believe they could have blown the id. We picked up two rare birds, which are described below.

2002 keeps coming up when I come across rare for Caltech birds and it still holds half a dozen of the record bird walks for number of species seen on an individual walk (it originally held 15 records with four ties). In terms of species, 2002 was easily the best Caltech bird walk year up to that point with a sum total of 889 species reported for the year (732 being the previous best). My first supposition is that the winter of 2001-2002 was extremely dry and that this led to a lot of birds seeking new habitat in our lush aqueduct fed lowlands, especially during autumn dispersal. Dry years lead to low water and, therefore, low food stocks whether you are after seeds or insects. This is the word for Caltech bird is water theory of abundance. The winter of 2006-7 was equally dry and 2007 had even more total species (938) than in 2002, making it the most species-rich year to that point. My dryness theory then runs into water, however. The winters of 2008-2011 were not excessively dry; yet species totals for 2009, 2010, and 2011 all exceed totals for 2002 and 2007. I view this as partly a consequence of the Station fire of 2009, which destroyed a lot of habitat (that just has to be where all those mountain chickadees are coming from) and partly due to an increasing number of eyes on the bird walk. So, is it just the lack of food and extra eyes and ears that lead to more sightings? Perhaps Alan has some thoughts on the matter.

The first highlight bird was brought to us by Vicky. In Tournament Park, she is looking up into the canopy and sees a flycatcher in action. The visceral response is that we have another black phoebe but the height in canopy is too high for a normal black phoebe and, with a little looking, it was obvious that we were dealing with something in the Contopus flycatcher clan (wood pewees and olive-sided flycatchers) and not a phoebe or Empidonax flycatcher. The bird is in a tree next to the track, so we have limited angles to play with and the bird keeps picking what are for us poorly exposed perches. However, we eventually manage to work it reliably down to a western wood pewee and Melanie has a new lifer.

This is only the eleventh western wood pewee reported on the Caltech bird walk. These birds winter in northern South America and breed all the way from Guatemala and Honduras, north to Alaska. And, if you plot up our sightings, it's clear that we are sporadically catching the pewees coming and going. In the Spring, we have sightings from late April to late May with one sighting on week 17, three on week 19, and one on week 21 (this year). For the Fall migration, we have had three sightings in week 34 and one each in weeks 35 (this year), 37, and 38 (i.e., late August through late September). We also have a sighting from week 9 in 1999. I must admit to finding that one a little suspicious but birds do end up in odd places at odd times.

The themeing of a walk can be moment or a view or it can found in a single chip. This time, we had a classic Darren moment. We had left Tournament Park and its pewee and passed the hummingbird lady's house. We are walking along the driveway towards Wilson Ave, when Darren hears a chip, not a chirp, not a song, not an extended soliloquy to the tasty glory of the California oak moth. We have a single tentative chip and Darren immediately calls a black-headed grosbeak. How cool is that? It took several minutes for us to get a viable view of the bird but, eventually, we all get a decent look. It is a juvenile (or perhaps adult female) with a yellowish buffy breast, well defined wing bars, sharp eyebrow, and a classic grosbeak beak. It was another life bird for Melanie.

It was only the ninth sighting of a black-headed grosbeak on the Caltech bird walk and only the second dispersal sighting. Most of our sightings are from the Spring weeks 17-20 (late April to mid-May), when the males are flamboyant and, often, rather talkative. Both the males and females move through our area over a roughly two week period, hence a big spike in week 17. In the Fall, the males leave first, in late July or early August and we have one sighting from week 31 that was probably one of these birds. The adult females and juveniles pass through, starting in late August, such as our bird of this week, but we have a legitimate shot at another up through the end of September. Incidentally, we now have the record for sightings of black-headed grosbeaks in a single calendar year (all of two).

The date: 8/27/2012
The week number: 35
The walk number: 1158
The weather: 90°F, sunny

The walkers: Vicky Brennan, Darren Dowell, Melanie Channon, John Beckett

The birds (19):

Rock Pigeon
House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
Lesser Goldfinch
Mountain Chickadee
Yellow-chevroned Parakeet
Nuttall's Woodpecker
Red-shouldered Hawk
Bewick's Wren
Black Phoebe
Band-tailed Pigeon
Red-masked Parakeet
Western Wood-Pewee
Turkey Vulture
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Black-chinned Hummingbird
Black-headed Grosbeak

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
10/1/12

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html



8/20/12
First, I deal with the hottest fact and then move on to hard and cool. What is the hottest fact? It's August. Noon in August is likely to be on the warm side and, if the day is also on the humid side, it can be genuinely unpleasant. The hard fact? Except for black-chinned hummingbirds and the odd flycatcher heading for monsoon midges in Mexico, there are few potential migrating birds passing through. Nor is there much in the way of arriving wintering birds. A possible exception is the possible onset of a new short distance migration of mountain chickadees into our area for the winter. If we keep seeing chickadees, I'd say it's a lock. On the other hand, we have lost some year round residents of the San Gabriel valley, like the red-crowned parrots that have moved to local food sources outside campus, in effect, a short distance migration away from us. Even if you are a bird sticking it out with us throughout the summer, you are probably not moving around any more than you have to at noon. Overall, opportunities on the avian front are weak in August. Birding is also a matter of eyes and ears; Caltech birders often migrate to vacations or conferences in August. Even the ones who stay on campus are often sessile due to the excessive heat. So it's fewer eyes and fewer feathers. It's the abyss of summer.

The coolest fact? August doesn't last forever. We are at week 34. Next week (week 35), the high is 21, the freaky sanctified residue of what had to have been an extraordinary day in 2002, when every resident bird in the area must have decided to fly forward and be counted (apart from that 21, 16 would have been the high). However, counts rise rapidly from there. Starting with week 37, the migrators will be arriving. Starting with week 37, the record highs are all above 20 until week 23 of next year. Starting in week 37, potential becomes more than nascent, the weather cooler. The birders are out and the birds are in. Of course, opportunity is not fruition. Week 37 also holds the all-time record low of 6 species but I'll take my chances.

I suppose that I need to talk about this week's walk. It was actually not uncomfortable. It was not a one-liter day (I tend to define difficult birding days as those requiring the consumption of a liter of water or more as soon as I get back to my office; this is usually a phenomenon reserved for 95+ F weather). Ok, it was a little toasty but we had a perfectly respectable mid-August species acquisition with 15 birds. We were well above the minimum (9) and median (13) for the week but no threat to the record of 18, which was set last year.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

There were a variety of minor highlights. We saw an acorn woodpecker on a palm tree near Wilson and California. We have been seeing these birds on the other side of campus off and on, lately, but not near Wilson. This could be a juvenile from the family whose territory is centered off campus across the street from Hill, which would be nice because it gave us the species for the day, but not exciting. Based on the crown, our bird was either a juvenile or adult female. If we are lucky, this bird is exploring on behalf of a family residing on the Pavilion's side of campus. Two families, even off campus would significantly increase our opportunities for seeing this species going forward.

Lesser goldfinches were abundant on this walk, especially in Tournament Park, where there was a lot of begging going on. In July and early August, lesser goldfinches become harder captures because they are in breeding mode. Later in August, however, fledged juveniles learn the rules of the flock and how to make a living. The flock, essentially a roving nursery school, is raucous and visually flamboyant. I should also mention chickadees again. We intersected at least three more chickadees this week, at least two in Tournament Park, leading to three virtually simultaneous independent IDs based on vocalization. Nobody saw them. We didn't see Jason's bird near the ticket office, but we did pick up another vocalization near Ramo near the end of the walk. This makes last week's sighting an official non-fluke. We now have eight chickadee sightings for the year, which is approaching the total of eleven we got last year, which exceeds the total of nine we had captured over the preceding couple of decades.

We had a three-hummingbird day, which is about as good as we can hope for. We do get identifiable adult male rufous hummingbirds occasionally but not today (we lump female/juvenile rufous and female/juvenile Allen's hummingbirds under the catch-all of Selasphorus because these birds can't be readily distinguished visually; blood tests are good for id but that's not usually practical). There are also a couple of hummingbirds not on the Caltech list that we could, in principle, see. Broad-tailed hummingbirds are basically Mexicans but they can be seen with some frequency in parts of Colorado and New Mexico (the only state where I have knowingly seen one). They are quite rare west of the Sierras, so it's not surprising that they haven't made our list. Costa's hummingbirds, on the other hand, are seen locally. I saw one on Colorado Blvd near Wilson, of all places, although that was many years ago. They also occur at the Huntington Library, which is quite close to campus. Costa's hummingbirds must have passed through campus at some point since 1986 but, apparently, they don't like to do it on a Monday between noon and 1 PM.

I don't know that I would call it a highlight but we did have an unusual sighting on Wilson just north of California. It was a loose ball flock of white birds heading south south east. A quick glassing made it clear that these were not snowy egrets but a flock of ten or so white rock pigeons. These birds were likely released as part of a local marriage or memorial ceremony and were heading home (this didn't have the numerical flavor of a sporting event). There is a couple (Nelsons') in Hacienda Heights who specialize in "white dove" releases that would be consistent with the orienteering of this flock. http://www.whitedoverelease.com/ but the birds could belong to some other LA basin aviary. The Nelsons' site has some nice videos of "dove" releases and it's a pleasant site overall but, if you are interested in this type of service, I would advise you to shop around because there are other dove release businesses in the area (i.e., don't take my selecting their site as a testimonial).

All of the white doves in our flock were, of course, fake doves (they are rock pigeons) but who cares. I think a suspension of belief entailed in releasing white pigeons instead of white doves is in order. They are a symbol Ovid could have written about. They are a moment of passage. They can carry ghosts. They can bless babies. They have their place. True doves are not homing, so a release is a death sentence (otherwise there would be the odd feral populations of white and partially white doves and you never see them). Rock pigeons bred white are a renewable resource because they will home to their coop after being released. Yes, the odd one will die along the way but you are essentially renting them out for your ceremony and the recovery rate is quite high.

When I started this report, I thought I was going to spend a lot of time talking about tiny magnetite crystals and how they impact the ability of migratory birds (and pigeons) to tell direction. Now, I'm not so sure. The interaction between magnetic fields and tissue got some seriously bad press in the eighteenth century because Franz Mesmer popularized the concept through a suite of miraculous cures (yes, he's the source of the word mesmerizing). Mesmer's extreme level of animal magnetism was debunked but his case so biased people against the idea that animals might be able to sense and/or respond to magnetic fields that it wasn't until the 1940s that the possibility resurfaced. Rock pigeons have a working magnetic compass and, sufficiently close to home, a visual and, perhaps, olfactory map. You can tell that there is a magnetic component because you can confuse a bird's compass with magnetic pulses. The rock pigeon subjected to this treatment will find true north in the wrong direction. Eventually, he figures out that the magnetic signal is giving him garbage, inconsistent with other cues (e.g., sun direction), and he proceeds to ignore it. Similarly, if you release a homing pigeon near a local (natural) magnetic anomaly that he has never encountered before, he will fly up or down the field lines of the anomaly for a while, sometimes for multiple kilometers, before he figures out that this is not the direction imposed by the larger scale magnetic field for the Earth.

So, rock pigeons can respond to a magnetic field and its intensity. The question is how do they do it. There are tiny magnetite crystals in 1-2 micron clusters in the upper beak of rock pigeons along nerves. These crystals will align with a magnetic field and one can reasonably surmise that if this alignment can be signaled to the bird's brain by a nerve, you would have the basic mechanism for an internal compass. However, recent work suggests that these magnetite crystals are actually in macrophages, which are big cells designed to eat junk in blood and initiate anti-pathogen responses by other cells; they are not directly attached to the nerve structures and, therefore, they are probably not participating in a magnetic compass for the bird. This is one of the beauties of science. What is obvious and Eureka-like in 2003 is challenged in 2012. Lots of tiny magnetite crystals a few nanometers in diameter dutifully jangling a bird's nerve as your orientation veers from a north-south magnetic plumb line, which is intuitively satisfying, suddenly become part of the bird's health defense repertoire. That doesn't mean that the standard model is wrong (if you cut that nerve, the bird loses its compass). It just means that we aren't finished looking at the problem. Magnetite crystals outside the macrophages may be the answer, or not. After all, we have millions of magnetite crystals in our brains and there is not much evidence for humans migrating along magnetic field lines without the help of a magnet (although some of those out in the middle of nowhere dead reckoning open boat navigator stories make you wonder). One can certainly conceive of the vast majority of the magnetite crystals in a bird being irrelevant but a few crystals posed properly being the key to an internal compass. Just to muddy the situation some more, I should also mention the possibility that certain chemical reactions associated with pigment cells in birds are sensitive to magnetic fields. This research is, however, at an early stage where the focus is on demonstrating that the mechanism is possible, not that it is the basis for magnetic compasses in animals. Stay tuned.

The date: 8/20/2012
The week number: 34
The walk number: 1157
The weather: 90°F, sunny

The walkers: Alan Cummings, Melanie Channon, Viveca Sapin-Areeda, John Beckett

The birds (15):

Rock Pigeon
House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
American Crow
Lesser Goldfinch
Black Phoebe
Black-chinned Hummingbird
Turkey Vulture
Mountain Chickadee
Band-tailed Pigeon
Bushtit
Hummingbird, Selasphorus

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
9/9/12

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html



8/13/12

Week 33 has the honor of the lowest high of the year with 14 in 2010. This week, it seemed for a while that the issue of the day was not whether or not we were going to threaten that lowly high but whether or not we were going to threaten the lowly low for the week, which is 9 (2008). In the end, however, we could claim an even dozen species, which lies above the median of 11 for the week.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

We were almost better by a bird. Near the end of the walk, Jason peels off the walk route so he can check on potential housing (he's currently "homeless"). About five minutes later, he returns to the walk route as he ambles back to his office and, in so doing, he catches sight of an acorn woodpecker in a palm tree off Holliston. Now, Viveca and I, who were the last members of the official walk, know this woodpecker. We have been seeing him off and on over the last several weeks and we were certainly looking for him as we walked down Holliston but we didn't see him. Jason does see him and the woodpecker would be species number 13 for us, if we could accept him. Could we? There are rule and rules. The Caltech bird walk species count is constructed from three sources. First, there are birds identified along the official walk route. We also accept birds that walkers see in transit between their office and the walk starting point across from Cahill. The rule is that the walker and/or the bird must be on or above Caltech property and that the bird must be sighted on a trip from the place you were at just prior to going to the walk. So, if you left your office and saw four birds as you walked to Starbuck's, two of them on Caltech property, picked up a coffee, walked back from Starbuck's along California, seeing three more birds in nonCaltech trees before you got to Wilson, and therefore Caltech property, and then saw one bird as you walked by Spalding to the walk starting point, only that last bird could be used. A similar rule applies to a departure from the walk. Once, you leave the walk, any bird seen on or from Caltech property is legal until you reach your first destination, whether that is your office or the Housing Office, or you leave Caltech property, whichever happens first. In this case, Jason saw the acorn woodpecker after he had completed a first outbound leg after departing from the walk. After that, he was still on Caltech property as he rejoined the walk route but he was officially off the walk (unless he had caught up with us) because he had already reached his first post walk destination.

Finally, I arrive in a frisson, brought to you by Jason Price. We are approaching the Caltech ticket office when Jason claims to have heard a chickadee. We only get one kind of chickadee around here, so this was tantamount to making a call for a mountain chickadee. Now, I didn't hear it (I need to be within 5 or 6 meters) and Viveca didn't catch it, which put us into confirmation mode. We spend a couple of minutes trying to pick up a visual from across the street with no luck, so we cross the street and converge under the target trees, looking for Jason's bird. We had a serious problem. There were bushtits everywhere. Our bushtit flocks had been getting skimpy because pairs (and threes - there are commonly unrelated male helpers) had been leaving the flock to breed but it looks like they are now back in force and reinforced with some newly fledged birds. Seeing one potential chickadee amongst 60 bushtits is a nontrivial exercise. It took several minutes of failing to unravel the crowd before the crowd began to unravel itself. The bushtits were gradually heading north while the chickadee was gradually heading south. Finally, we all registered brief but unambiguous glimpses. We had our first mountain chickadee of the season and our seventh chickadee sighting of the year.

2011 was an extraordinary year for chickadees because we had eleven sightings, all after week 33. In previous years, chickadee sightings were sporadic, only nine altogether, only one in any given year, except for 1987 when there were two sightings on successive weeks (i.e., potentially the same bird) and in only eight years between 1986 and 2010 (i.e., chickadee sightings were a once in every three year or so event). In 2011-2012, we had an explosion of sightings, starting with a Tournament Park bird in week 35 of 2011 and extending to week 16 of this year. We had 17 sightings in 33 weeks, a classic overwintering species profile. That's once every couple of weeks instead of once every three years or a 52% rate versus a 0.8% rate. The key will be whether or not the residence of last winter, which involved at least several different birds, is going to be repeated. I'm not ready to get overly excited, yet, because juveniles disperse from breeding grounds in August and September. So, it is possible that we just had one of those rare juvenile chickadee sightings but, if this bird is part of a newly established phenomenon, we are going to be seeing a lot of chickadees over the next few months and if the sightings rate is anything like it was last year, we should have a new record for chickadee sightings in a calendar year (we already have seven so far this year and the eleven sightings of last year were all between weeks 35 and 52). Mohammed may have had to go to the mountain but the mountain chickadees may be coming to us. If so, the new harbinger of Fall may not be the kinglets and yellow-rumped warblers coming in a couple of months from far north of us but rather a local migrator coming out of the San Gabriel mountains. I have hopes that Fall will come in August and spin the Summer down.

The date: 8/13/2012
The week number: 33
The walk number: 1156
The weather: 93F, sunny

The walkers: Alan Cummings, Jason Price, John Beckett, Kent Potter, Viveca Sapin-Areeda

The birds (12):

Northern Mockingbird
House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
Anna's Hummingbird
American Crow
Band-tailed Pigeon
Common Raven
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Black Phoebe
Bushtits
Mountain Chickadee
Red-masked Parakeet

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
8/17/12


http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html


8/6/12

It was a walk of no. There were no caws gathering the multitude, no cackles, no begging, no crows, no sailors in the sky, no ravens, no vultures, no hawks, no falcons. There was no chirping siesta from a sparrow, no towhee, no pigeon, no goldfinch, no wren, no starling, no jay, no mocking bird, no warbler (well that one was not unexpected), no keys. It was also a walk of ones. We saw one mourning dove, one mallard, one black phoebe, and one house finch. We heard some red-masked parakeets but we didn't see them and we saw several hummingbirds although I didn't hear them. It was hot. We confronted a hot laden, gripping heat at noon and it only got worse as the walk unfolded. We were cast us like shrouded wrecks along a transom path churning little in our wake. Did I mention that it was hot? Alan hopped from shade to shade. I'm sure that I looked wilted. I blasted through a liter of water when I got back. Kent managed to maintain a dapper look, somehow. The secret must lie in the beard.

It was a walk of almost. Alan misplaced his Maintenance yard keys and, had I not gone over the main gate and Kent through the side gate, we would have missed our one mourning dove. Had somebody walking away from the parking structure not flushed a house finch just as I was walking up Wilson, we would have had no finch. Had Alan not seen the black phoebe, we probably wouldn't have acquired one of them either. We were but a whisper from sliding down the bowels of tough birding to that ugly place where there awaits the all-time record of six bird frustration set in week 37 of 2006. As it is, we closed with a tally of eight, tying walks of 2001 and 2004 for the worst species totals ever for a week 32 bird walk.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

On a much brighter note, Kent Potter has just passed Glenn Hamell for career bird walks and is now in sole possession of second place with 356. Kent has been taking in the walk at a fairly steady clip since 2001. Among currently active nonAlan walkers, only Viveca with 214 career walks can be mentioned in the same breath but, if Kent stopped walking today and Viveca made every walk going forward (keeping in mind that nobody has ever done more than 48 walks in a year), it would 2015 before she could possibly catch him. Of course, to put things into perspective, if Alan stopped walking today, not even Kent could hope to match his career total in walks before 2025. I can only say that I wish Kent many happy returns.

Choosing a highlight bird for the week seems almost morbid but I will, out of near necessity, select the Anna's hummingbird. We had a pleasant time looking at the multi-feeder house just outside Tournament Park, where we saw a numerous Anna's and Selasphorus hummingbirds on or around the feeders. There was also a possible black-chinned hummingbird but the feeders are rather far away from the fence, the birds are small, and nobody had a spotting scope. I would be willing to say that it was more likely than not, just based on form but we just couldn't pull the trigger on a positive identification.

The word for bird is water. It is the essence of life and birds, as is true of any other creature, must acquire what they need directly through drinking or through their prey. The word for hummingbird is river. An Anna's will consume its weight in water every 15 hours or so, on average. An Anna's lives on nectar (or sugar water from a feeder) when it can but insects make up a substantial portion of the diet, particularly at certain times of the year. Like many birds, a female Anna's manipulates protein delivery in the diet of her young (males are occasionally observed feeding young but it's not typical or even uncommon). During the morning, the nestlings (almost always two) get nectar and the odd insect that their mother happens to run into, but later in the day she switches, providing a much higher insect to nectar ratio even if nectar is readily available. Why? It's all about energy. Sugar is a Roman candle energy source and carbohydrates, which are also available from nectar to some extent, are inefficient for hummingbirds, certain human diets notwithstanding. Protein has staying power and, if you don't want your nestlings to starve in the dark, you want them to build up a reserve in the afternoon. So, you let your local insects run rampant in the morning and you suck them up in the afternoon.

Anna's are decidedly territorial and have been expanding range through their ability to take advantage of urban sprawl and its explosion of exotic backyard flowers and feeders. These are often rich territories and Anna's are very good at defending rich territories. For several years, a single female Anna's owned my property, both in the front and in the back yard. I don't put out feeders but she vigorously defended our fuchsias and drove off all other hummingbirds, except that she would tolerate her own young for a week or two after they fledged. She had favored perches that varied with time of day and season and I could almost always find her within a few minutes if I was so inclined. In the late Spring, when our river silk tree bloomed, she would try to defend the entire tree but after a couple of days, she would give up and allow any hummingbird who wanted it, unfettered access to the tree (she continued to defend the fuchsias in front). I must admit to being rather fond of her. I am sorry to report that she died in the great windstorm and her empire seems to have been split, like Alexander's. There are now two new Anna's on my property, one in front, a female who also owns the yard across the street, and another in the back. I do not seem to have bonded with either of them, so far. Perhaps, it's part of the "grieving" process.

Ravens are the intellectual giants of the avian world and other corvids like crows are certainly not stupid. Anna's hummingbirds are, shall we say, on the other side of the intellectual spectrum. They depend on hard-wired responses to environment and this obviously works most of the time but it can also get them into trouble. For example, an Anna's will respond to a serious threat by flying straight up and, if there is something in the way, she can't revise the security arrangement by going sideways. This leads to hummingbirds getting stuck in the rafters of garages. Even though there is a huge opening available to the bird, it will not be able to escape. It will starve in there because it can't turn off the threat response. Only you can help. There are many on-line suggestions, should you have this problem, ranging from putting a feeder at the mouth of the garage to entice the bird down, to using a pool net to exhaust the bird, so that it is forced to drop down to the ground where you can then drive it out so that it "escapes you", to darkening the garage, which forces the bird to drop to the ground, where you can scoop it up (you will, hopefully, have remembered to bring a flashlight for this exercise, and take it outside.

The male's dive display (fly up 20 or 30 meters; make sure that your gorget glints in the sun; dive down next to your display objective singing as you go; come out of the dive about a meter away from it, whipping your tail as you go by to produce a sharp click at the bottom; hover to make sure that your performance is being appreciated; and repeat as needed) is another example of a hard-wired response. It's a great attention getter but the male doesn't always manage to choose a female Anna's for a courtship display. Even I have been the object of a male Anna's affection and I weigh significantly more than 4 grams. Still, there is something to be said for a bird wanting to zip by you at 60 miles per hour. If you think about it in terms of the rate of speed per unit body length, that's double the best for a peregrine falcon, even though the peregrine is the fastest bird alive in terms of raw speed.

The date: 8/06/2012
The week number: 32
The walk number: 1155
The weather: 94 F, sunny

The walkers: Alan Cummings, John Beckett, Kent Potter

The birds (8):

Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Mallard
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Red-masked Parakeet
Bushtits
Black Phoebe

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
8/11/12
http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html


current walk report / two time plots / probability plots / raw data