bird data > past walk reports

8/29/11 (revised)

We picked up 16 species under difficult conditions (temperatures in the low nineties, moderately humid, and no cloud cover) and acquired an excellent highlight bird. Our species total was well below the week 35 record high of 21 but safely above the median of 12 and way above the record low of 7.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

It looked like it was might be a tough sell and a light crowd. The temperature promised to be in the mid-nineties by the time the walk was over and two of our three regulars were going to be absent. Alan was on a well-deserved vacation and Vivica was busy hopping airports with her husband, who is a private pilot. He gets to fly to interesting places and she gets to hunt for a pileated woodpecker. It sounds like a great relationship to me. Melanie, who has been making a fair number of walks, of late, was also out of town. If all of the occasional walkers were also on vacation or decided that a nice air-conditioned lunch inside was better than a hot walk outside, I could be doing the walk by myself. So, I put on my best cajoling outfit and talked George Rossman into coming or, rather, he was kind enough to allow himself to be talked into coming. We got a nice view of a red-tail from California Blvd. as we were waiting but we weren't joined by anybody else and launched off into the walk at noon. Darren caught up with us a couple of minutes later as we stood at the corner of the tennis court trying to decide whether or not a call George had heard was a lesser goldfinch. I couldn't hear it (ergo, not a starling but not necessarily a goldfinch) but George's description sounded just like a Vivica lesser goldfinch rendition, although not nearly as animated. I was mulling over whether or not this should count as a species (we had no visual, George was a little uncertain on the call and, given that he knows lesser goldfinch calls quite well, that meant that I also needed to be uncertain), when Darren walks up and asks if we had heard the lesser. I took that as a confirmation for species number two and off we went, now the three musketeers. The Maintenance yard didn't yield a lot but I can tell you that's where I feel Alan's absence most profoundly because, if he's not there, I am usually on spider flushing duty and, although I have yet to swallow one, I did get a mouthful of webbing once (tripped) and I also encountered a spider crawling down my ear trying to get away from me (I get shivers just typing that one in; fortunately both of us survived). The species count started picking up in Tournament Park, including the bird of the day, which I describe below. We failed to get any acorn woodpeckers on Wilson, as is often the case when it is hot and cloudless. Acorn woodpeckers usually have a favored hang out for hot sunny weather that is sometimes visually accessible but we don't know where that is yet. We were at 13 species but late acquisitions of yellow chevron-winged parakeets and bushtits put us up to 15.

The highlight of the day was in the Tournament Park parking lot. Darren and George were working on a Nuttall's when Darren suddenly announces that we had a chickadee. My response to this was, "You're kidding!" However, Darren immediately responded with "No, I'm not," and indeed he was not. I saw a pasty little bird from the side in the upper canopy of a tree and George got a solid visual from the front. Darren whips a camera out of his knapsack, hoping to get a photo, but he wasn't fast enough. Our bird, having spent several minutes with us, decided that he had finished the local cuisine. He pops through two trees in rapid succession and leaves our field of view before Darren can get a shot off.

My surprise over getting a mountain chickadee reflects the rarity of sightings for this species on Caltech bird walks (this is a 1% kind of occurrence for us). We have only nine previous sightings of mountain chickadees, none in week 35 (four were in weeks 8-10 and four in weeks 39-44) and we haven't seen a chickadee since 2007. Mountain chickadees are common at higher elevations in the San Gabriels but, during August, especially if the coniferous seed crop is poor, juveniles often drop to lower elevations as they disperse from their natal territories. It is likely that our bird was in an egg a couple months ago and, if he is very lucky, he will back up the mountain, strong enough to carve out his own territory sometime next winter. It's not clear exactly where this territory might be beyond saying that it won't be in or near his natal territory. He will be finding a life-long mate, although chickadees are willing to "trade up" on occasion by dropping their current mate in favor of an older bird who lost his or her mate. We can also be confident that he will be staying in southern California because our mountain chickadees are part of an isolated population that hasn't talked to anybody from Arizona or New Mexico in about a million years. I don't expect that our bird will be breaking with this tradition.

The date: 8/29/11
The week number: 35
The walk number: 1106
The weather: 91°F, full sun

The walkers: John Beckett, George Rossman, Darren Dowell

The birds (16):

House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Crow
Red-tailed Hawk
Lesser Goldfinch
Red-whiskered Bulbul
Red-masked Parakeet
House Wren
Nuttall's Woodpecker
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Mountain Chickadee
Black Phoebe
Yellow-chevroned Parakeet
Bushtit

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
9/9/11

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html




Editor's note: total was 16 not 15 as originally reported.

8/22/11

The beginning was inauspicious. We had a grand total of one pre-walk species scattered among five walkers. Typically, we get three or four pre-walk species this way and, although all of these birds are usually seen again during the walk, only a few fond memories have flowed from such anemic state of sourcing. Darren and Melanie picked up a black phoebe vocalization by the tennis courts but our species total had not improved markedly by the time we left the Maintenance yard. All of us were hoping to make up some ground in Tournament Park but, as we exited the Maintenance yard, we were greeted by a backhoe tearing up asphalt and generally making a noisy nuisance of itself. Even worse, all possible routes to the park were being guarded by a suspicious orange coated supervisor who was, I am sure, not looking upon us with any great favor. So, we dawdle over the playing field and think ourselves fortunate when the construction crew suddenly breaks for lunch. Weren't we lucky!? We pass them by to make the gate to Tournament Park, feeling the faint echoes of people who have just escaped a terrible fate, but were soon frustrated by an entry frozen with a heavy chain. Gandalf didn't make the walk and neither of Alan's master keys could master the lock. Nor was there any appetite for climbing a ten-foot chain link fence, even if it hadn't meant giving a cluster of interested four year olds a really bad idea, and that left us with just two options. We could skip the most species-rich segment of the walk or take a detour around the gyms and swimming pool and approach the park from the back end. We chose the latter and we chose well. The species list shot up with a yellow-chevron-winged parakeet, red-whiskered bulbul, yet another summer orange-crowned warbler, a western tanager, and a Nuttall's woodpecker among others. Both the tanager and the Nuttall's were new lifers for Melanie. We supplemented the harvest with acorn woodpeckers and house sparrows on Wilson and, upon seeing a few bushtits by the ticket office, we found ourselves holding a new record high for week 34 with 18 species, two above the previous mark.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

The record high of 14 for week 33, which we failed to breach last week, is beginning to look like the bottom of a ravine. There were a number of highlights. The Nuttall's always seemed to be on the wrong side of the tree (for us, anyways), but by posting birders on both sides, we all obtained some very good looks. I think our bird may have been a little frustrated because he shuddered in front of me and let off a series of sharp chirps that even I could hear. Also, towards the end of the walk, we were graced by a juvenile male lesser goldfinch molting into adult plumage, his soon to be solid black crown still shredded with numerous flecks of green. He was having a good time on the lawn adjacent to San Pasqual, straining dandelion seeds and ignoring the birders just a few feet away. Although not part of a bird story, we also saw a bee hive smothered in bees; a swarm was about to take off.

I've described above some of the pleasant interludes deserving of mention for our walk but the western tanager has a special place. This bird was near Morrisroe and yielded identity slowly but surely, a yellow bird of robin size, pinkish beak (i.e., light colored), clearly marked wing bars, and more patience in gleaning than you would have expected from a typical oriole (I didn't get an angle on the tail but I'm sure it was notched). There was no vocalization. We either had a juvenile western tanager or an adult female. I suspect an adult because we are at the leading edge of the Fall migration rather than the back end where juveniles are more common but it could have been either. Western tanagers are relatively rare for us. We average about one sighting a year but the captures are very spotty. Prior to this January, we hadn't even seen a tanager on the walk in over five years. This year, we already have four sightings, the most ever for a calendar year, and we have an opportunity for more because the Fall migration is just beginning. The vast majority of western tanagers winter in southern Mexico or Central America, although a few winter on the west coast, which accounts for our occasional winter sighting. In the Spring, usually sometime during weeks 17-20, western tanagers pass through Pasadena on their way to breeding grounds mostly well to our north, and, in the Fall, we get the southward migration with sightings most commonly occurring in weeks 39-41. This year, we have two sightings in successive weeks in January (probably the same bird), a little odd but not extraordinary, a sighting in week 13, about a month before normal, and now a sighting in week 34, about a month before normal. We've been having a very strange abundant year for tanagers. Perhaps the oddest thing about western tanagers is a general lack of information. Sure, there's been some attention paid to tanager nesting habits and those brilliant orangey-red feathers on the adult males and their origin (rhodoxanthin). We think perhaps we possibly maybe might know that juveniles tend to hang out for a while at intermediate places during migration to molt because this reduces drag and hence energy costs, but we know next to nothing about what these birds do in Mexico or how the population responds to different environmental stimuli of which we provide plenty. You would think that an insectivore that doesn't turn her beak up at berries or even seeds, that likes the margins between light and dense canopies (think clear cutting, fires, and transitional urbanization), and is vulnerable to cowbird parasitism would attract a lot of serious scientific attention for the potential insight into the implications of habitat modification. The population dynamics are, however, rather poorly understood. I don't know if this speaks to fad or is just a curious oversight.

With some birds, we can't avoid an interaction. The observation or its attempt influences behavior, as we found with the Nuttall's, and this can be bad for a bird if too much energy is consumed or we incite the attention of a real predator. Some birds seem oblivious or aware but uncaring. Our lesser goldfinch is in one of these classes although it would perhaps have been better were he not. Similarly, we generally have no meaningful communion with a soaring bird because he is far away and neither of us is on the other's menu. For tanagers, who often forage fairly high in the canopy, we are like a mist of the bird's breath. This is only one bird that lingers in her leaves for a day or a few days before flying away with the evening (western tanagers are nocturnal migrants although we have no clue just how high they like to fly or what if any celestial cues or guides they tend to use) but the pause, however lightly stated, is in its purest form. It is a natural flux captured with the lightest of touch to mark the season's senses of another place. We don't know where but in our walking hides the holding moment of an individual compelled in time. It is time. We have time. It is time to see the Yucatan. It is time for us to walk and to watch.

The date: 8/22/11
The week number: 34
The walk number: 1105
The weather: 80°F, partly cloudy

The walkers: Alan Cummings, John Beckett, Melanie Channon, Darren Dowell, Vivica Sapin-Areeda

The birds (18):

House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
Crow
Red-masked Parakeet
Black Phoebe
Lesser Goldfinch
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Band-tailed Pigeon
Yellow-chevroned Parakeet
Orange-crowned Warbler
Red-whiskered Bulbul
Wren, species
Nuttall's Woodpecker
Western Tanager
Bushtit

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
9/7/11

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html




8/15/11

The big news of the day is that Alan's back is back. He was walking a little gingerly but he was also so mobile that it was Alan who was in the lead and dictating the pace of the group. The rest of us were littered in his wake. I thought he might crater towards the end of the walk but it didn't happen, so we have, once again, Alan's march towards the big three zero (his one thousandth walk).

The acorn woodpeckers were also back in force. We saw three of them clustered together on a palm tree, another flying in, and a fifth individual at the top of a small oak in the Avery Garden, hanging upside down. We all thought this last sighting was very strange behavior for an acorn woodpecker. Personally, I think he's been watching too many bushtit videos. We spent a little time sex typing the three woodpeckers on the palm tree (one male, one female, and one shy). In case you're interested, you look for a black band between the white above the bill and the red crest. Both sexes have an extensive red crest but the red feathers on the males and juveniles reach all the way down to white; in the females, there is a black band between the red and white. Incidentally, the juveniles carry male plumage for their entire first year, which led some early researchers to think there was a heavy duty skew in the population towards the males. The true male/female ratio is fairly close to one.

Our species total for the day was 11, short of the week 33 record high (14) but not too bad considering the conditions and, of course, the time of year.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

There were no rare captures for this week, so I thought to linger for a parsing moment on the meaning of a composition. Sridhara brought his camera and, although noon is usually a terrible time for easy photography, you can still get lucky on occasion and the practice of finding a strong composition is, to me at least, more enthralling than whether or not you happen to get a good photo. I know that Sridhara got at least one excellent composition. There were several red-masked parakeets in Tournament Park, some in full panoply, nibbling on flowers or seeds, and one bird providing only a partial view. This parakeet had the usual prominent white eye ring of his species surrounded by a cherry red crown, then green with a hint of shoulder red and a yellow-taupe bill, all framed by the grayish brown notch of a tree with an out of focus background contributing a soothing mesh of duller green and suffused light. The bird, curious about the clicking apparition flashing light thirty feet below, was paying close attention and, in the process, becoming lost in pose. It reminded me, for no particularly good reason, of Rembrandt's painting "Young Girl at a Half-Open Door".

I don't know how Sridhara's story ended, as the lighting was quite difficult, but it really doesn't matter. This was an ephemeral composition that some techno-bauble's resolution could potentially have shared but not immured. Having turned from the moment, however, I found myself drawn to the opportunity. This bird belongs in Ecuador. What's he doing here? The answer, of course, lies in a breeding descent from escapees or an intentional release. We have no reports of this species on Caltech walks prior to 1999 and broader surveys for the San Gabriel Valley show a population of red-masked parakeets rising from a couple dozen in 1997 to many times that today. This is a bird on the ascent. Such a response, however, bears another obvious fruit. To what extent are we following the pet trade in our walks? Red-masked parakeets (generally referred to as red-masked conures or cherry-headed conures in the pet trade) are fairly popular as pets, although they are definitely not for everyone because they can be quite noisy (your ideal neighbor is either far away or deaf). Many releases probably reflect the inability of an owner to deal effectively with their bird but a lot are likely accidental escapes or intentional releases due to wild fires (the Bel-Air fire of 1961 apparently provided the core of west LA's feral bird population). If you'd like a sense for the personality of red-masked parakeets, you should pop some popcorn and watch "The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill".

A perusal of the Caltech bird list yields at least ten species introduced into southern California through controlled or uncontrolled releases and they come from a litany of the broader world (red-crowned parrot - Brazil; house sparrow - Europe; yellow chevron winged parakeet - Brazil, Bolivia, and northern Argentina; red-masked parakeet - Ecuador and northern Peru; red-whiskered bulbul, common pea fowl and spotted dove - India and south east Asia; yellow-headed parrot - Mexico and Central America; European starling - Europe; rock dove - Europe, northern Africa and southern Asia; Budgerigar - Australia). So, red-masked parakeets are not alone in belonging elsewhere. Most of the people who care about such things, also consider the brown-headed cowbird to be an introduced species. These birds used to mind their own business, following the bison herds up and down the Great Plains and adding mobility to their lives by adding their speckled eggs to sparrow and warbler nests (they are nest parasites). We kill off the bison they depend on over an alarmingly short period and, for many bird species, the silence of a disaster like this might have been the sound of extinction but, for cowbirds, it marked a great awakening. We brought cattle and other livestock through the Great Plains and introduced brown-headed cowbirds to the revolutionary concept that you can go east or west as well as north and south. They were in Pasadena by the early 1900s and they have been thriving ever since at the local extinction cost of many open nesting birds. Another possible introduced species, cattle egrets, didn't get to the U.S. until the 1940s but it's possible they actually flew across the Atlantic without any help from us. Let's see. It's eleven, twelve, or thirteen (more if I missed some). However you count, there are only 119 specific species in the Caltech birding list, which means that roughly ten per cent of the species we have seen on our walks belong someplace else and, in the last couple of walks, it has been more like twenty per cent (2/11 and 3/13). I think we must be gods or idiots. On the one hand, we exterminate our only major native parakeet because the locals view them as competition and food, not necessarily in that order (Carolina parakeet), but we have, on the other hand, introduced a wide variety of exotic parakeets and other species into areas without a consideration of consequence. Some have produced stable feral populations locally and others, like house sparrows and starlings, have taken over the country.

The date: 8/15/11
The week number: 33
The walk number: 1104
The weather: 82°F, sunny

The walkers: Alan Cummings, John Beckett, Vivica Sapin-Areeda, Kent Potter, Sridhara Chakravarthy

The birds (11):
House sparrow
Mourning Dove
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
Crow
Lesser Goldfinch
Common Raven
Bushtit
Red-masked Parakeet
Black Phoebe
Hummingbird, Selasphorus

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
8/19/11

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html




8/8/11

Alan is still down for the count, enough so that he had to cancel attending a conference in China this week. So, here we were, alas, Alanless again. The walk was nevertheless pleasant weather-wise compared to last week, 10 degrees cooler and a lot drier and our bird count of 13 was a respectable showing, although a couple shy of the week 31 record of 15.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

With a little luck we could have tied the record as we saw a (nonphoebe) flycatcher near Morrisroe that none of us could get a glass on before he dropped out of sight and, later, Viveca saw what might have been a female oriole fly into a tree near our northern turn off from Wilson but several minutes of coaxing failed to yield the bird. On a more positive note, there were half a dozen band-tailed pigeons ensconced around the Tournament Park area, which could be good for us in the coming weeks, but the highlight of the day was seeing three acorn woodpeckers along Wilson. Our typical acorn woodpecker sighting is of one, or often more, birds hanging out on the trunks of palm trees towards the top. They are most active early and late in the day, which is a disadvantage for noon hour walkers but our odds are not too bad if there are woodpeckers to be had. There just haven't been any acorn woodpeckers to be had for quite a while. They are year-round residents in California (some from Arizona do migrate) but families come and go, particularly if there is an acorn crop failure or, more likely for Caltech, the destruction of a granary. Hopefully, this family is going to stick around for a while. We have plenty of growing acorns and the family is just in time to take advantage of the Fall harvest.

Perhaps it is a prurient sliver in ourselves that is the heart of fascination but a discussion about acorn woodpeckers always seems to devolve into snickery allusions to communal breeding. So, let's get that out of the way. It is, after all, a serious and legitimate oddity among birds. There are north of ten thousand species of birds in the world but in only ten will you find two or more females laying eggs in the same nest (ostriches play the same game although they have a very different, harem-based social system) and in only 140 bird species do you see females consistently using multiple mates in a given season (opportunistic polyandry, if you want to get fancy). In California, acorn woodpeckers form family groups with one or two (occasionally three) related breeding females (e.g., sisters) and 1-7 related breeding males (usually 1-3), none of whom are related to the breeding females. There are also typically some nonbreeding helpers (0-10) that are progeny from previous seasons. This basic social fabric appears to be optimized for 1-2 breeding females and a total family size of about six. The females are enforced synchronous breeders because a female will destroy any eggs laid in her nest by other members of the same family until she starts laying eggs of her own (yes, that means she is likely destroying her sister's eggs). This may not sound very ethical from a humano-centric anthropomorphizing sort of perspective but late hatching chicks in a clutch will generally starve to death. Our female has a very good reason for keeping any head starts down to a minimum and I can guarantee that her sister would do the same thing to her overly early eggs were the roles to be reversed.

If you watch an acorn woodpecker for a while, you may see him fly out 20 or 30 feet and then pop back to more or less the same place he started from. Your bird just got a wasp or a bee and I'm sure he would tell you that it was really quite tasty. Flycatching is a major and preferred source of food for acorn woodpeckers. They also eat beetles and other insects and a family will usually have a favored sap-sucking tree. In fact, acorn woodpeckers generally eat much more other stuff than acorns. So, what's the big deal about the acorns? During the breeding season in the Spring (they will occasionally also breed in the Fall if there is an exceptionally good acorn harvest), there are a lot of insects around but the chicks get most of them (high in protein, high in energy) and the adults eat acorns to make up for some of this gifted protein loss. This is the essence of acorn hoarding. By making do with acorns, which you can in principal, store up for a time of need, you greatly increase the fledging weight and health of your chicks. So, where does the communal breeding come in? A family will usually own one or more source oak trees, although I have seen my local family storing walnuts on occasion, one or more granaries (dead limbs, dead standing trees, telephone poles), and a favorite anvil, where things can be pummeled before consumption (crossbars on telephone poles are popular). This all takes so much work to develop and defend that I tend to think of acorn woodpeckers as the gardeners of the bird world. The acorns are only edible for about a year and the previous Fall season's acorns tend to be consumed by summer, so you are always working with the most recent acorn crop. Your granaries need constant guarding because the local riff-raff like scrub jays or squirrels would like to steal from your larder and the acorns shrink as they dry so you can't just pop an acorn into a hole and expect it to be sitting there when you want it a few months later. You are going to have to move it to a smaller hole and, if you don't have a suitable smaller hole, you are going to have to make one. If your old acorn hole gets too big or rotted out to be useful, you need to make a new one. Has your old nest hole rotted out or been taken over by starlings? Make a new one. At some point, you are resource limited but if you have more males and females involved, or potentially involved, in producing your chicks, there are more birds near you likely to help in caring for them. More birds allow you to better defend against intruders into your territory. More birds allow you to optimize your larder hoarding and more birds means greater socialization. Also, this is good for the helpers. The down side of the breeding scheme used by acorn woodpeckers is that breeding opportunities for young birds can be quite limited. They aren't allowed to mate with their parents and trying to move in with another family will lead to a quick expulsion from the territory. The only time a breeding opportunity opens up in a saturated area is when somebody dies. Since they can't go off and breed immediately, at least not locally, the helpers often stay in their natal territories and develop life skills, which gives them a better chance of snagging breeding spots when an opportunity does come along. On the whole, I would say that acorn woodpeckers have developed a robust but flexible solution to an interesting resource problem. I'm a fan.

On another note, I think it might be worth pointing out that next week's walk has the lowest record high bird count for any week of the year (14). This is a very accessible total on a good summer day, so we have a shot at making a little history.

The date: 8/8/11
The week number: 32
The walk number: 1103
The weather: 76F, sunny

The walkers: John Beckett, Vivica Sapin-Areeda, Kent Potter

The birds (13):

Northern Mockingbird
House Sparrow
Mourning Dove
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Acorn Woodpecker
Crow
Red-masked Parakeet
Band-tailed Pigeon
Red-whiskered Bulbul
Selasphorus Hummingbird
Black Phoebe
Lesser Goldfinch

--- John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
8/13/11

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html




8/1/11

Alan is improving by the day but a two mile walk, or even a one mile walk, was just out of the question. The usual rule is that you must do at least half a walk in either time or space to be credited with having been on it. I offered Alan credit for the walk if he just made it to the Maintenance Yard, a very good deal, considering his office is in Cahill, which is essentially on top of the starting point for the walk. Alan, however, declined. That back is still one sick puppy.

Before the walk, I heard a promising "rumor" from a reliable source (George Rossman) that there had been three acorn woodpeckers along Wilson at 10 AM. We didn't see them during the walk but I'm hoping this means our palm trees have recovered from their haircuts and that we will again see the occasional acorn woodpecker. This species lives in extended family groups and the whole tribe tends to abandon an area if their granaries are disturbed or a local oak tree chopped down (i.e., you can go from frequent sightings to no sightings almost instantly). I'm sure that Caltech's palm pruning exercise was a big loss but, perhaps, the memories of those evil times are beginning to slip away.

It was a hot humid walk for us and I don't think the birds were crazy about the weather either. The conditions improved somewhat as the walk went along (on a relative basis, mind you). The temperature rose several degrees but the humidity also dropped by several percent. On the positive side, we had a three hummingbird day, which is pretty good considering how hummer poor the last few weeks have been, but we only made ten species overall. I thought we were doomed to a single digit day but, towards the end of the walk, we picked up a lesser goldfinch, which put us into double figures. To quote Vivica, "We worked hard for them. I'm exhausted." I can't say I was exhausted but I blasted through a liter of water immediately after returning to my office and an hour later I was still wet from the accumulated sweat. My walk companions, Melanie and Vivica, deserve gold stars.

See the plots at http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/species_time.html and http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/bird_data/two_plots.htm

The highlight bird has to be the black-chinned hummingbird. This is one of those species we sporadically see rather frequently, ten times each in 2007 and 2008 but in most years, it's more like 0-2. We actually saw two of these birds this week, probably both juveniles, one just outside the Tournament Park parking lot and the other on Wilson next to Morrisroe, although I suppose it is possible that these were they same bird.

Life is pattern and black-chinned hummingbirds are a good example of how some of these patterns intersect our walks. If you were to pull up Alan's probability plot for this species, you would probably conclude there was not much to see but do a simple histogram and a clear pattern emerges. There are two peaks. The first, which has the highest maximum, occurs in the Spring, during weeks 16-20 (i.e., mid-April to mid-May), and there is a second peak with a long tail that starts around week 24 (mid-June) and tails off into mid-August. Although the maximum for this second peak is lower, there are more than half again as many sightings. So, what does this mean? Our black-chinned hummingbirds winter in Mexico. During the Spring, most of them migrate past us to find suitable, preferably riparian, nesting territories to the north, although a few do choose to breed in our area. First, the males come through and then, about a week later, the females pass by. Exactly which couple of weeks this happens varies from year-to-year and, in most years, we get 0-1 sightings from this group. In mid-to-late June, the male black-chins migrate back down to Mexico, pretty much in a lump as they did coming north. The adult females and, especially, the juveniles lag behind and take their time in migrating. This leads to a tail-off in Caltech sightings after June for any given week but since there are a third more birds involved, spread out over a much longer time period, we end up with more sightings from the southward migration.

And now for the factoid of the day: black-chinned hummingbirds currently hold the record for the smallest genome among all bird species (910 million base pairs) and, in fact, they currently hold the record for all amniotes. You shouldn't think of this as a source of disparagement, however, because it clearly works for them.

The date: 8/1/11
The week number: 31
The walk number: 1102
The weather: 87°F, sunny and humid

The walkers: John Beckett, Melanie Channon, Vivica Sapin-Areeda

The birds (10):

House Sparrow
House Finch
Anna's Hummingbird
Crow
White-throated Swift
Red-masked Parakeet
Bushtit
Hummingbird, Selasphorus
Black-chinned Hummingbird
Lesser Goldfinch

-- by John Beckett

Respectfully submitted,
Alan Cummings
8/8/11

http://birdwalks.caltech.edu/index.html




current walk report / two time plots / probability plots / raw data